FootballEdgeSeason 2026/27Self-updating record
Full time · 2. Bundesliga · Sun 06 Sep 2026, 12:30 UTC

VfL Osnabrück 31 Eintracht Braunschweig

← Back to the board

What the chances were worth

VfL Osnabrück
2.44
expected goals (xG)
Eintracht Braunschweig
1.86
expected goals (xG)

The scoreline says 3–1; by chance quality the match ran 2.44–1.86.

The brain read

The xG read 2.4–1.9 in VfL Osnabrück's favour, but the shot count told the opposite story — 13–21 overall and 8–12 on target went Eintracht Braunschweig's way. The two pictures disagree, and aggregate counts can't see the quality of individual chances — so this reads closer than either number alone suggests. Eintracht Braunschweig got into the box far more often (14 shots inside it to 11). Eintracht Braunschweig's finishing let them down — 1 from 1.9 xG despite 12 of 21 shots on target (a finishing read inferred from shots on target and goals vs xG — not measured shot placement).

A second opinion written by rule from the numbers on this page — where the shot picture and the xG disagree, it says so rather than picking a winner. Backward-looking only; it claims nothing about any future result.

The match in numbers

VfL Osnabrück
Eintracht Braunschweig
45%
Ball Possession
55%
13
Total Shots
21
8
Shots on Goal
12
3
Shots off Goal
7
2
Blocked Shots
2
11
Shots inside box
14
2
Shots outside box
7
5
Corner Kicks
5
1
Offsides
1
426
Total passes
523
321
Passes accurate
433
11
Fouls
13
1
Yellow Cards
5
0
Red Cards
0
10
Goalkeeper Saves
5
13
Free Kicks
11

As returned by the data feed at full time. Bars show each side’s share of the stat.

Confirmed line-ups

Captured from the official team sheets in the last hour before kick-off. The pick test requires these to be in before any call counts.

VfL Osnabrück 3-4-3

  1. 10 I. Badjie (F)
  2. 11 R. Meißner (F)
  3. 15 B. Jacobsen (M)
  4. 21 A. Beck (F)
  5. 24 J. Müller (D)
  6. 25 N. Wiemann (D)
  7. 26 F. Wagner (M)
  8. 27 R. Fabinski (D)
  9. 31 P. Kammerbauer (M)
  10. 32 J. Krumrey (G)
  11. 42 J. Gómez (M)

Bench: N. Sauter, B. Riesselmann, L. Raimund, L. Opitz, L. Münst, D. Kyereh, T. Janotta, K. Faber, J. Abu Hanna

Eintracht Braunschweig 4-1-4-1

  1. 1 R. Hoffmann (G)
  2. 4 A. Hoti (D)
  3. 6 F. Flick (M)
  4. 7 Yann Sturm (M)
  5. 8 M. Aydın (D)
  6. 9 M. Entrup (F)
  7. 10 S. Di Benedetto (M)
  8. 15 Max Marie (M)
  9. 17 A. Opoku (M)
  10. 21 K. Ehlers (D)
  11. 22 F. Di Michele Sanchez (D)

Bench: Jan Urbich, B. Uphoff, L. Tempelmann, J. Mijatović, D. Kovacevic, N. Katterbach, Junior Arlet Zé, L. Frenkert, T. Wagner

The market’s read

VfL Osnabrück
41%
market implied · price 2.25 · opened 41%
Draw
27%
market implied · price 3.44 · opened 27%
Eintracht Braunschweig
32%
market implied · price 2.95 · opened 32%
MarketConsensus priceImplied chanceMove
Double chance VfL Osnabrück or draw1.3768.6%+0.4 pts
Double chance Eintracht Braunschweig or draw1.6058.6%-0.3 pts
Double chance either team1.2972.8%-0.1 pts
Draw no bet — VfL Osnabrück1.6656.3%-0.5 pts
Draw no bet — Eintracht Braunschweig2.1343.7%+0.5 pts
Over 1.5 goals1.2077.7%+1.4 pts
Over 2.5 goals1.6955.7%+1.7 pts
Over 3.5 goals2.6035.5%+2.1 pts
Both teams to score1.5659.1%+0.8 pts
VfL Osnabrück over 1.5 team goals1.9847.4%+1.8 pts
Eintracht Braunschweig over 1.5 team goals2.3839.5%+0.9 pts
VfL Osnabrück clean sheet3.4027.7%+0.0 pts
Eintracht Braunschweig clean sheet4.3321.7%-1.7 pts

Shortest-priced scorelines: 1-1 6.48 · 2-1 8.64 · 1-0 9.20 · 1-2 10.35 · 0-1 10.95

Consensus of bookmaker prices captured 2026-09-06 11:00 UTC. These are the closing prices — the market’s last word before kick-off. The Move column is how each market’s implied chance has shifted since the first price we captured: green = the chance has risen (the price shortened, backing coming in), red = the chance has fallen (the price eased out — what punters call the price ‘drifting’).

Prices are observations, not offers. Each price is the average across the bookmakers the collector sees, and the implied chance is that price with the bookmaker’s margin stripped out. The market’s read is published so the model’s read can be judged against it — nothing here is advice, and nothing here is staked.