FootballEdgeSeason 2026/27Self-updating record
Full time · Serie A · Sat 19 Sep 2026, 19:45 UTC

Venezia 0–2 Lazio

← Back to the board

What the chances were worth

Venezia
1.88
expected goals (xG)
Lazio
1.60
expected goals (xG)

The scoreline says 0–2; by chance quality the match ran 1.88–1.60.

The brain read

Little between them on chances created — the xG read 1.9–1.6, shots 17–11 with 6–2 on target. Venezia got into the box far more often (10 shots inside it to 5). Venezia's finishing let them down — 0 from 1.9 xG despite 6 of 17 shots on target (a finishing read inferred from shots on target and goals vs xG — not measured shot placement). On chances created the game was tighter than the 0–2 suggests.

A second opinion written by rule from the numbers on this page — where the shot picture and the xG disagree, it says so rather than picking a winner. Backward-looking only; it claims nothing about any future result.

The match in numbers

Venezia
Lazio
50%
Ball Possession
50%
17
Total Shots
11
6
Shots on Goal
2
6
Shots off Goal
6
5
Blocked Shots
3
10
Shots inside box
5
7
Shots outside box
6
1.88
Expected goals (xG)
1.60
7
Corner Kicks
2
2
Offsides
0
479
Total passes
493
409
Passes accurate
428
85%
Passes %
87%
13
Fouls
8
5
Yellow Cards
0
0
Goalkeeper Saves
7
1.65
Goals prevented
1.65

As returned by the data feed at full time. Bars show each side’s share of the stat.

Confirmed line-ups

Captured from the official team sheets in the last hour before kick-off. The pick test requires these to be in before any call counts.

Venezia 3-5-2

  1. 1 Filip Stanković (G)
  2. 2 Matias Moreno (D)
  3. 3 Joel Schingtienne (D)
  4. 10 John Yeboah (F)
  5. 14 Thierry Correia (M)
  6. 15 Juan Jesus (D)
  7. 18 Antoine Hainaut (M)
  8. 19 Simon Sohm (M)
  9. 21 Þórir Jóhann Helgason (M)
  10. 45 Akor Adams (F)
  11. 71 Kike Pérez (M)

Bench: Lorenzo Montipò, Rufai Mohammed, Ale Gomes, Redouane Halhal, Toni Fernández, Richie Sagrado, Kornel Lisman, Lorenzo Berardi, Lamine Fanne, Simone Panada, Albion Rrahmani, Lion Lauberbach

Lazio 4-3-3

  1. 10 Mattia Zaccagni (F)
  2. 14 Tijjani Noslin (F)
  3. 15 Romano Floriani Mussolini (D)
  4. 16 Davide Frattesi (M)
  5. 17 Nuno Tavares (D)
  6. 21 Reda Belahyane (M)
  7. 22 Matteo Cancellieri (F)
  8. 24 Kenneth Taylor (M)
  9. 25 Oliver Provstgaard (D)
  10. 35 Christos Mandas (G)
  11. 37 Josip Šutalo (D)

Bench: Davide Renzetti, Edoardo Motta, Diogo Leite, Danilho Doekhi, Alfonso Pedraza, Manuel Lazzari, Valerio Farcomeni, Danilo Cataldi, Federico Serra, Gustav Isaksen, Andrea Pinamonti, Albert Guðmundsson

The market’s read

Venezia
27%
market implied · price 3.54 · opened 26%
Draw
27%
market implied · price 3.59 · opened 27%
Lazio
46%
market implied · price 2.05 · opened 47%
MarketConsensus priceImplied chanceMove
Double chance Venezia or draw1.7753.6%+1.5 pts
Double chance Lazio or draw1.3072.9%-1.2 pts
Double chance either team1.2973.5%-0.3 pts
Draw no bet — Venezia2.4937.3%+0.6 pts
Draw no bet — Lazio1.4862.7%-0.6 pts
Over 1.5 goals1.2077.7%+2.0 pts
Over 2.5 goals1.7255.5%+2.4 pts
Over 3.5 goals2.6435.4%+2.7 pts
Both teams to score1.5958.6%+2.1 pts
Venezia over 1.5 team goals2.6335.8%+2.1 pts
Lazio over 1.5 team goals1.8650.7%+1.0 pts
Venezia clean sheet5.0019.0%-1.8 pts
Lazio clean sheet3.2529.0%-2.2 pts

Shortest-priced scorelines: 1-1 6.58 · 1-2 8.14 · 0-1 8.76 · 0-2 10.45 · 2-1 11.20

Prices are observations, not offers. Nothing here is advice or staked.

How to read this table

Consensus of bookmaker prices captured 2026-09-19 18:30 UTC. These are the closing prices — the market’s last word before kick-off. The Move column is how each market’s implied chance has shifted since the first price we captured: green = the chance has risen (the price shortened, backing coming in), red = the chance has fallen (the price eased out — what punters call the price ‘drifting’).

Prices are observations, not offers. Each price is the average across the bookmakers the collector sees, and the implied chance is that price with the bookmaker’s margin stripped out. The market’s read is published so the model’s read can be judged against it — nothing here is advice, and nothing here is staked.