Almeria 2–0 Celta de Vigo II
What the chances were worth
The scoreline says 2–0; by chance quality the match ran 2.40–0.65.
The brain read
Almeria created the better chances — the xG read 2.4–0.7 and the shot count agreed (16–12, 6–1 on target). Almeria got into the box far more often (12 shots inside it to 8). On the balance of chances, the 2–0 reads fair.
A second opinion written by rule from the numbers on this page — where the shot picture and the xG disagree, it says so rather than picking a winner. Backward-looking only; it claims nothing about any future result.
The match in numbers
As returned by the data feed at full time. Bars show each side’s share of the stat.
The market’s read
| Market | Consensus price | Implied chance | Move |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double chance Almeria or draw | 1.10 | 85.0% | -1.8 pts |
| Double chance Celta de Vigo II or draw | 2.71 | 34.6% | +2.6 pts |
| Double chance either team | 1.17 | 80.4% | -0.8 pts |
| Draw no bet — Almeria | 1.15 | 81.4% | -2.0 pts |
| Draw no bet — Celta de Vigo II | 5.02 | 18.6% | +2.0 pts |
| Over 1.5 goals | 1.18 | 79.3% | -0.7 pts |
| Over 2.5 goals | 1.60 | 58.8% | -0.8 pts |
| Over 3.5 goals | 2.48 | 37.9% | -1.3 pts |
| Both teams to score | 1.75 | 52.8% | +0.9 pts |
| Almeria over 1.5 team goals | 1.45 | 64.3% | -1.3 pts |
| Celta de Vigo II over 1.5 team goals | 3.84 | 24.3% | +1.4 pts |
| Almeria clean sheet | 2.10 | 44.3% | +0.0 pts |
| Celta de Vigo II clean sheet | 8.00 | 11.9% | +0.0 pts |
Shortest-priced scorelines: 2-0 7.08 · 1-0 7.41 · 2-1 7.50 · 1-1 8.17 · 3-0 9.63
Prices are observations, not offers. Nothing here is advice or staked.
How to read this table
Consensus of bookmaker prices captured 2026-09-20 08:02 UTC. These are the closing prices — the market’s last word before kick-off. The Move column is how each market’s implied chance has shifted since the first price we captured: green = the chance has risen (the price shortened, backing coming in), red = the chance has fallen (the price eased out — what punters call the price ‘drifting’).