FootballEdgeSeason 2026/27Self-updating record
Full time · Championship · Sat 31 Oct 2026, 15:00 UTC

Bolton 2–3 Bristol City

← Back to the board

What the chances were worth

Bolton
1.28
expected goals (xG)
Bristol City
3.16
expected goals (xG)

The scoreline says 2–3; by chance quality the match ran 1.28–3.16.

What the model expected

Its probabilities for this match, logged before kick-off and never changed. The result is highlighted.

Bolton
37%
Draw
28%
Bristol City
35%

Before kick-off the model favoured Bolton to win (37%); it finished with Bristol City to win. A miss — it gave the actual result 35% beforehand.

One match tells you nothing on its own — whether these percentages are any good is the whole point of the calibration page, where every one of them is scored.

The brain read

Bristol City created the better chances — the xG read 1.3–3.2, with the shot count roughly even (19–14, 6–9 on target). Bolton held 65% of the ball. On the balance of chances, the 2–3 reads fair.

A second opinion written by rule from the numbers on this page — where the shot picture and the xG disagree, it says so rather than picking a winner. Backward-looking only; it claims nothing about any future result.

The match in numbers

Bolton
Bristol City
65%
Ball Possession
35%
19
Total Shots
14
6
Shots on Goal
9
5
Shots off Goal
3
8
Blocked Shots
2
10
Shots inside box
11
9
Shots outside box
3
1.28
Expected goals (xG)
3.16
11
Corner Kicks
4
2
Offsides
5
589
Total passes
320
497
Passes accurate
237
5
Fouls
7
1
Yellow Cards
1
0
Red Cards
0
6
Goalkeeper Saves
4
7
Free Kicks
5

As returned by the data feed at full time. Bars show each side’s share of the stat.

Confirmed line-ups

Captured from the official team sheets in the last hour before kick-off. The pick test requires these to be in before any call counts.

Bolton 4-2-3-1

  1. 1 J. Bonham (G)
  2. 3 C. Forino-Joseph (D)
  3. 4 X. Simons (M)
  4. 6 B. Davies (D)
  5. 8 J. Sheehan (M)
  6. 10 S. Dalby (F)
  7. 11 T. Gale (F)
  8. 16 S. Iling-Junior (F)
  9. 17 A. Ito (M)
  10. 22 Gaizka Larrazabal (D)
  11. 25 M. Conway (D)

Bench: L. Brunt, Ruben Rodrigues, K. Dong, Luca Stephenson, Max Lott, D. Watson, D. Harrington, A. Famewo, T. Bair

Bristol City 4-2-3-1

  1. 2 L. Eissat (D)
  2. 3 C. Pring (D)
  3. 6 B. De Keersmaecker (M)
  4. 8 J. Williams (M)
  5. 9 L. Tolaj (F)
  6. 12 J. Knight (M)
  7. 15 L. McNally (D)
  8. 19 G. Tanner (D)
  9. 21 Rio Cardines (D)
  10. 23 D. Ballard (F)
  11. 40 B. Collins (G)

Bench: S. Bell, S. Greenwood, T. Horvat, A. Randell, S. Tickle, S. Twine, J. Wallace, R. Atkinson, Y. Hirakawa

The market’s read

Bolton
31%
market implied · price 3.00 · opened 34%
Draw
27%
market implied · price 3.40 · opened 27%
Bristol City
41%
market implied · price 2.26 · opened 39%
MarketConsensus priceImplied chanceMove
Double chance Bolton or draw1.6058.5%-1.9 pts
Double chance Bristol City or draw1.3668.9%+2.7 pts
Double chance either team1.2972.6%-0.8 pts
Draw no bet — Bolton2.1842.9%-3.0 pts
Draw no bet — Bristol City1.6457.1%+3.0 pts
Over 1.5 goals1.2475.5%-1.0 pts
Over 2.5 goals1.8052.6%-1.9 pts
Over 3.5 goals2.9232.0%-1.9 pts
Both teams to score1.6257.5%-1.2 pts
Bolton over 1.5 team goals2.4937.4%-3.0 pts
Bristol City over 1.5 team goals2.0844.9%-0.0 pts
Bolton clean sheet4.0023.4%+0.0 pts
Bristol City clean sheet3.4027.7%+0.9 pts

Shortest-priced scorelines: 1-1 6.24 · 0-1 8.52 · 1-2 8.72 · 1-0 10.21 · 2-1 10.36

Prices are observations, not offers. Nothing here is advice or staked.

How to read this table

Consensus of bookmaker prices captured 2026-10-31 14:56 UTC. These are the closing prices — the market’s last word before kick-off. The Move column is how each market’s implied chance has shifted since the first price we captured: green = the chance has risen (the price shortened, backing coming in), red = the chance has fallen (the price eased out — what punters call the price ‘drifting’).

Prices are observations, not offers. Each price is the average across the bookmakers the collector sees, and the implied chance is that price with the bookmaker’s margin stripped out. The market’s read is published so the model’s read can be judged against it — nothing here is advice, and nothing here is staked.