FootballEdgeSeason 2026/27Self-updating record
Full time · 2. Bundesliga · Sat 31 Oct 2026, 19:30 UTC

Karlsruher SC 2–1 1. FC Heidenheim

← Back to the board

What the chances were worth

Karlsruher SC
1.58
expected goals (xG)
1. FC Heidenheim
1.34
expected goals (xG)

The scoreline says 2–1; by chance quality the match ran 1.58–1.34.

What the model expected

Its probabilities for this match, logged before kick-off and never changed. The result is highlighted.

Karlsruher SC
23%
Draw
25%
1. FC Heidenheim
52%

Before kick-off the model favoured 1. FC Heidenheim to win (52%); it finished with Karlsruher SC to win. A miss — it gave the actual result 23% beforehand.

One match tells you nothing on its own — whether these percentages are any good is the whole point of the calibration page, where every one of them is scored.

The brain read

Little between them on chances created — the xG read 1.6–1.3, shots 13–18 with 9–7 on target. 1. FC Heidenheim got into the box far more often (13 shots inside it to 7). On chances created the game was tighter than the 2–1 suggests.

A second opinion written by rule from the numbers on this page — where the shot picture and the xG disagree, it says so rather than picking a winner. Backward-looking only; it claims nothing about any future result.

The match in numbers

Karlsruher SC
1. FC Heidenheim
45%
Ball Possession
55%
13
Total Shots
18
9
Shots on Goal
7
4
Shots off Goal
8
0
Blocked Shots
3
7
Shots inside box
13
6
Shots outside box
5
1.58
Expected goals (xG)
1.34
4
Corner Kicks
6
2
Offsides
2
355
Total passes
423
261
Passes accurate
325
8
Fouls
13
2
Yellow Cards
2
0
Red Cards
0
5
Goalkeeper Saves
7
12
Free Kicks
8

As returned by the data feed at full time. Bars show each side’s share of the stat.

Confirmed line-ups

Captured from the official team sheets in the last hour before kick-off. The pick test requires these to be in before any call counts.

Karlsruher SC 3-5-2

  1. 1 H. Bernat (G)
  2. 3 D. Ofli (M)
  3. 6 S. Väänänen (M)
  4. 7 K. Wiethaup (M)
  5. 10 M. Wanitzek (M)
  6. 13 S. Fukuda (F)
  7. 15 Paul Scholl (D)
  8. 22 C. Kobald (D)
  9. 23 T. Civeja (F)
  10. 24 S. Trémoulet (D)
  11. 36 Rafael Pinto Pedrosa (M)

Bench: Louey Ben Farhat, V. Bergh, L. Egloff, Héliton, R. Himmelmann, D. H. Zor, J. Ponente, J. D. Meyer, N. Eichinger

1. FC Heidenheim 4-4-2

  1. 3 J. Schöppner (M)
  2. 6 P. Mainka (D)
  3. 8 P. Hennrich (M)
  4. 10 C. Conteh (M)
  5. 11 B. Zivzivadze (F)
  6. 19 J. Föhrenbach (D)
  7. 22 O. Mhamdi (D)
  8. 24 M. Costly (M)
  9. 27 M. Heule (D)
  10. 29 M. Kaufmann (F)
  11. 33 T. Dähne (G)

Bench: Y. Wagner, A. Vogt, T. Siersleben, L. Paqarada, J. Niehues, Adam Kölle, M. Honsak, Frank Feller, M. Busch

The market’s read

Karlsruher SC
29%
market implied · price 3.16 · opened 31%
Draw
25%
market implied · price 3.76 · opened 25%
1. FC Heidenheim
46%
market implied · price 2.04 · opened 44%
MarketConsensus priceImplied chanceMove
Double chance Karlsruher SC or draw1.7354.1%-2.1 pts
Double chance 1. FC Heidenheim or draw1.3370.5%+1.9 pts
Double chance either team1.2475.4%+0.3 pts
Draw no bet — Karlsruher SC2.3639.6%-2.6 pts
Draw no bet — 1. FC Heidenheim1.5560.4%+2.6 pts
Over 1.5 goals1.1283.3%-0.1 pts
Over 2.5 goals1.4663.9%-0.2 pts
Over 3.5 goals2.1543.7%-0.5 pts
Both teams to score1.4165.7%-0.5 pts
Karlsruher SC over 1.5 team goals2.1244.0%-1.3 pts
1. FC Heidenheim over 1.5 team goals1.6656.2%+1.2 pts
Karlsruher SC clean sheet5.5017.2%+0.0 pts
1. FC Heidenheim clean sheet3.7525.0%+1.6 pts

Shortest-priced scorelines: 1-1 7.60 · 1-2 8.63 · 2-2 10.54 · 2-1 11.02 · 0-1 11.51

Prices are observations, not offers. Nothing here is advice or staked.

How to read this table

Consensus of bookmaker prices captured 2026-10-31 19:25 UTC. These are the closing prices — the market’s last word before kick-off. The Move column is how each market’s implied chance has shifted since the first price we captured: green = the chance has risen (the price shortened, backing coming in), red = the chance has fallen (the price eased out — what punters call the price ‘drifting’).

Prices are observations, not offers. Each price is the average across the bookmakers the collector sees, and the implied chance is that price with the bookmaker’s margin stripped out. The market’s read is published so the model’s read can be judged against it — nothing here is advice, and nothing here is staked.